HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Civil)2008

TSE NGAN HEUNG v. THE RITZ-CARLTON LTD AND OTHERS

Related cases with same parties

  • CACV312/2006TSE NGAN HEUNG v. THE RITZ-CARLTON LTD AND OTHERS
  • CACV353/2001TSE NGAN HEUNG v. THE RITZ-CARLTON LTD. AND OTHERS
  • HCPI565/1999TSE NGAN HEUNG v. THE RITZ-CARLTON LTD. AND ANOTHER
  • HCPI570/2000TSE NGAN HEUNG v. THE RITZ-CARLTON LTD.
  • HCPI658/2000CHAN YUET LUI REBECCA v. THE RITZ-CARLTON LTD. AND OTHERS
61394-EN-2008-06-16

TSE NGAN HEUNG v. THE RITZ-CARLTON LTD AND OTHERS

HTML content

FAMV No. 6 of 2008

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 6 OF 2008 (CIVIL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 312 OF 2006)

_____________________

HCPI 565/1999

Between:

 TSE NGAN HEUNGPlaintiff
  - and - 
 THE RITZ-CARLTON LIMITED1st Defendant
(Respondent)
 LO SIN TAK2nd Defendant
 THE MING AN INSURANCE CO. (HK) LTD3rd Defendant
(Applicant)

HCPI 570/2000

Between:

 TSE NGAN HEUNGPlaintiff
 - and - 
 THE RITZ-CARLTON LIMITEDDefendant
(Respondent)

HCPI 658/2000

Between:

 CHAN YUET LUI REBECCAPlaintiff
  - and - 
 THE RITZ-CARLTON LIMITED1st Defendant
(Respondent)
 LO SIN TAK2nd Defendant
 THE MING AN INSURANCE CO. (HK) LTD3rd Defendant
(Applicant)

_____________________

Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ

Date of Hearing: 16 June 2008

Date of Determination: 16 June 2008

 

________________________

D E T E R M I N A T I O N

________________________

Mr Justice Bokhary PJ :

1. The proposed appeal involves two questions of law.  First, where a plaintiff successfully sues an uninsured defendant and receives payment of the judgment amount from the Motor Insurers’ Bureau, does this extinguish the liability of a different defendant who is a joint tortfeasor?  Secondly, what are the Bureau’s rights, if any, pursuant to sections 48 and 49 of the High Court Ordinance Cap.4?  These are reasonably arguable questions which, by reason of their great general or public importance, ought to be submitted to the Court of Final Appeal for decision.  Leave to appeal is therefore granted.

 

 

(Kemal Bokhary)
Permanent Judge

(Patrick Chan)
Permanent Judge

(RAV Ribeiro)
Permanent Judge

 

Mr Charles Sussex SC and Mr Raymond Leung (instructed by Messrs Ip, Kwan & Co.) for the applicant

Mr Mohan Bharwaney SC (instructed by Messrs Winnie Mak, Chan & Yeung) for the respondent