HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2008

HKSAR v. HOANG, VAN THINH

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
60772-EN-2008-03-28

HKSAR v. HOANG, VAN THINH

HTML content

HCMA 140/2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 140 OF 2008

(ON APPEAL FROM ESCC 207/2008)

----------------------

BETWEEN  
 HKSARRespondent
 and 
 HOANG, VAN THINHAppellant

----------------------

Before:  Deputy High Court Judge Line in Court

Date of Hearing:  28 March 2008

Date of Judgment:  28 March 2008

 

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

 

1. This is an appeal against two concurrent sentences of 8 months each, passed following pleas of guilty to two charges of wounding.  The offences occurred in Stanley Prison.  Two men were watching television.  This appellant approached them from behind and attacked them.  He used a pen to stab at their heads.  One of the victims received a 4.5 centimetre long laceration to his head and abrasion to his face, and the second victim received three stab-wounds, each of about a half a centimetre in length. 

2. In my view, 8 months was not a day too long for that conduct.  It was a cowardly attack from behind with a weapon.  The appellant today says that his victims seemed fine afterwards.  They were clearly walking wounded, but they were certainly wounded.

3. The other point he makes is that those victims later attacked six friends of his and they received only 4 months' imprisonment.  If that sentence was unduly lenient - and I have no reason to think it is because I do not know the facts about it - it would not avail this appellant in this case. 

4. This appeal against sentence is dismissed. 

 

 

 (P Line)
Deputy High Court Judge

 

Mr Martin Hui, Senior Government Counsel, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent

Appellant, Hoang, Van Thinh, in person