HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Civil)2009

TAM SHUK YIN ANNY v. CHOI KWOK CHAN AND OTHERS

Related cases with same parties

  • CACV105/2008TAM SHUK YIN ANNY v. CHOI KWOK CHAN AND OTHERS
  • FACV3/2010TAM SHUK YIN ANNY v. CHOI KWOK CHAN AND OTHERS
69956-EN-2010-02-26

TAM SHUK YIN ANNY v. CHOI KWOK CHAN AND OTHERS

HTML content

FAMV No. 51 of 2009

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 51 OF 2009 (CIVIL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM CACV NO. 105 OF 2008)

----------------------

Between  
 TAM SHUK YIN ANNYPetitioner
(Respondent)
 and 
 CHOI KWOK CHAN1stRespondent
(1st Applicant)
 FUNG LAI MEI BETTY2ndRespondent
(2nd Applicant)
 ACTIVE TEAM INTERNATIONAL LIMITED3rdRespondent
 ADVANCE WISE DEVELOPMENT LIMITED4thRespondent
 WISE APEX ENTERPRISES LIMITED5thRespondent
 RICHMOND PROPERTIES AND TRADING COMPANY LIMITED6thRespondent

----------------------

Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ

Date of Hearing: 26 February 2010

Date of Determination: 26 February 2010

---------------------------------------

D E T E R M I N A T I O N

----------------------------------------

 

Mr Justice Chan PJ:

1.  The matter in dispute is the order of the Judge awarding interest on the Petitioner’s share of the net proceeds of sale of 2 properties owned by a company called “Richmond” which was in turn jointly owned by the parties. The Judge’s order was, on appeal, varied by the Court of Appeal. The amount involved is said to be at least $26 million.

2.  It is conceded, quite rightly in our view, that the appeal is plainly not as of right and no argument has been presented on this limb.

3.  We are satisfied that it is quite arguable that there is no sound or legitimate basis for the award of interest, either as ordered by the Judge or as re-formulated or adjusted by the Court of Appeal and that it would be wrong to allow the award to stand. In these circumstances, which we think are rather exceptional, we would grant leave to appeal on the “or otherwise” limb under s.22(1)(b). 

(Kemal Bokhary)(Patrick Chan)(R A V Ribeiro)
Permanent JudgePermanent JudgePermanent Judge

Mr Edward Chan, SC, Mr Dennis Law & Mr Lawrence Cheung (instructed by Messrs Howell & Co) for the applicants

Mr Anthony Neoh, SC and Mr Jeremy Bartlett (instructed by Messrs J. Chan, Yip, So & Partners) for the Respondent