HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Criminal)2010

HKSAR v. CHAN WAI YIP AND OTHERS

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
71887-EN-2010-07-09

HKSAR v. CHAN WAI YIP AND OTHERS

HTML content

FAMC No. 38 of 2010

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 38 OF 2010 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM HCMA NO. 449 OF 2008)

_____________________

Between:

 HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONApplicant
 - and - 
 CHAN WAI YIP1st Respondent
 FUNG MOON KWAI2nd Respondent
 HUNG CHAU MING3rd Respondent
 WONG LIT4th Respondent
 SIN KAM SING5th Respondent
 CHOI KWAI SING6th Respondent
 CHAN CHUN KIM7th Respondent
 LEE CHI YING8th Respondent
 CHEUNG CHI KEUNG9th Respondent
 WONG CHUNG TIT10th Respondent
 LI YUK FAI11th Respondent
 WONG TAK HING12th Respondent
 CHEUNG MUI FONG13th Respondent
 FUNG MOON KWONG14th Respondent
 TANG YIU KWAN15th Respondent
 LI SAI HUNG16th Respondent
 WONG OI KWAN17th Respondent
_____________________
Appeal Committee :Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ
Date of Hearing :
Date of Determination :
9 July 2010
9 July 2010

________________________

D E T E R M I N A T I O N

________________________

 

Mr Justice Bokhary PJ :

1.  Whether the circumstances of this case amount to a conspiracy to defraud involve arguable points of law which merit the attention of the Court of Final Appeal. Time for applying for leave to appeal is extended and the prosecution is granted such leave under the “point of law” limb of s.32(2) of the Court’s statute.

(Kemal Bokhary)
Permanent Judge
(Patrick Chan)
Permanent Judge
(RAV Ribeiro)
Permanent Judge

Mr Wesley W C Wong and Mr Michael Wong (of the Department of Justice) for the applicant

Mr Martin Lee SC and Ms Bonnie Tam (instructed by Messrs JCC Cheung & Co.) for the 3rd, 5th to 9th, 13th, 15th to 17th respondents

Mr Kenny Chan (instructed by Messrs Liu, Chan & Lam) for the 4th, 10th and 11th respondents

Mr Gibson Shaw (instructed by Messrs Lo, Wong & Tsui) for the 12th respondent

The 1st, 2nd and 14th respondents in person.