HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Criminal)2010

RAYMOND CHEN v. HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

Related cases with same parties

  • DCEO2/2016RAYMOND CHEN v. J. V. FITNESS LTD
  • FACC1/2010RAYMOND CHEN v. HKSAR
  • FACC3/2012LAI KWOK FAI v. HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
  • FACC7/2007PUN LUEN PAN v. HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
  • FACC8/2009KO MAN CHUN v. HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
  • FAMC24/2012HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION v. KWOK TSZ-LOK, LEO<br>
  • FAMC38/2008WONG CHI KING v. HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
  • FAMC45/2009MA CHOR MING AND ANOTHER v. HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
  • FAMC48/2009MOHAMMAD MAHABOBUR RAHMAN v. HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
  • FAMC49/2009KO MAN CHUN v. HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
  • FAMC51/2010TANG YUK FAI v. HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
  • FAMC60/2008CHAN WING YIU v. HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
  • FAMC64/2010KO KIT v. HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
  • FAMC7/2010SOO CHUN SOU, DOMINIC v. HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
  • HCCC329/2016HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION v. YEUNG SHEK KIN
  • HCCC458/2013HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION v. CHOW CHI WAI AND ANOTHER
  • HCMA250/1997HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION v. LEUNG Kam-yung
  • HCMA285/1997HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION v. WONG TIN CHUK
  • HCMA299/1997HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION v. CHAN Che-man
  • HCMA326/1997HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION v. SZE Chun-ping
71768-EN-2010-06-29

RAYMOND CHEN v. HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

HTML content

 

FAMC No. 6 of 2010

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION 

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 6 OF 2010 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM HCMA NO. 606 OF 2009)

----------------------

 

Between  
 RAYMOND CHENApplicant
 and 
 HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONRespondent

 

----------------------

 

Appeal Committee:     Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ

Date of Hearing:     29 June 2010

Date of Determination:     29 June 2010

--------------------------------------

D E T E R M I N A T I O N

---------------------------------------

 

Mr Justice Bokhary PJ :

1.  Is it appropriate for a trial court to launch an inquiry into whether or not an accused person had made an out-of-court statement helpful to him?  That is what the Magistrate did, the applicant complained against and the appeal judge held was appropriate.  Whether or not such a course is appropriate is now a question of law which ought to be resolved by the Court of Final Appeal.

2.  There is another question of law arising out of this case which ought to be resolved by the Court of Final Appeal.  It is whether the appeal judge was right in his view that there exists what he called “modern jurisprudence” pursuant to which credibility can be dealt with on the transcript in the way which he did.

3.  Leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal is granted. 

[Discussions on dates.]

4.  The appeal is fixed to come on hearing at 10:00 am on 22 November 2010.

(Kemal Bokhary)
Permanent Judge
(Patrick Chan)
Permanent Judge
(RAV Ribeiro)
Permanent Judge

 

Mr Robert Y.H. Pang (instructed by Messrs. Haldanes and assigned by the Legal Aid Department) for the applicant

Ms Wong Sze-lai, Lily (of the Department of Justice) for the respondent