HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Criminal)2010

MOK SWEE CHUAN v. HKSAR

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
74328-EN-2010-12-14

MOK SWEE CHUAN v. HKSAR

HTML content

FAMC No. 69 of 2010

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 69 OF 2010 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM CACC NO. 96 OF 2007)

____________________

Between:

 MOK SWEE CHUANApplicant
 - and -
 HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGIONRespondent

____________________

Appeal Committee:Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ
Date of Hearing:14 December 2010
Date of Determination:14 December 2010

_________________________

D E T E R M I N A T I O N

_________________________

 

Mr Justice Bokhary PJ:

1.  While the Court of Appeal’s reasons for affirming this conviction may be open to question, it is plain beyond reasonable argument to the contrary that any real danger that the jury would put the previous conviction to any prejudicial use would have been removed by the trial judge’s directions.

2.  Despite the care with which this application has been prepared and the ability with which it has been presented, leave to appeal is refused.

(Kemal Bokhary)
Permanent Judge
(Patrick Chan)
Permanent Judge
(R A V Ribeiro)
Permanent Judge

 

Mr David Boyton (instructed by Messrs Joseph C. T. Lee & Co.) for the applicant

Ms Agnes Chan (of the Department of Justice) for the respondent