HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Civil)2010

THE CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF HONG KONG ALSO KNOWN AS THE BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH IN HONG KONG INCORPORATION v. SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1997SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. WONG KWONG FEI and Another
  • CAAR10/1998SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. HUI SIU MAN, RICKY
  • CAAR10/2007SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHOI SUI HEY
  • CAAR10/2010SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. AMINA MARIAM BOKHARY
  • CAAR10/2011SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. YAN SHEN
  • CAAR10/2021SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHAN KIN PONG BONNY
  • CAAR11/2001SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHEUNG CHUN-CHIN & OTHERS
  • CAAR11/2006SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHUNG YUI HUNG
  • CAAR11/2007SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. MA KWAI CHUN
  • CAAR11/2010SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHAN CHUN FAI
  • CAAR11/2011SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. KAN BRIAN PING CHEE
  • CAAR11/2021SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. PASTANA CARVALHO ANDREZA NARELY
  • CAAR11/2022SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. TAM YING YUEN
  • CAAR1/1999SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. KWAN CHI CHEONG AND OTHERS
  • CAAR1/2002SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHAN BOON NING
  • CAAR1/2003SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. TSO TSZ KIN
  • CAAR1/2004SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. WONG KWOK KAU
  • CAAR1/2005SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. LI MAN TAK AND OTHERS
  • CAAR1/2006SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHAU WAN FUN
  • CAAR1/2007SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHIU CHUN WAI AND ANOTHER
74299-EN-2010-12-13

THE CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF HONG KONG ALSO KNOWN AS THE BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH IN HONG KONG INCORPORATION v. SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE

HTML content

FAMV No.19 of 2010

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 19 OF 2010 (CIVIL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACV NO. 18 OF 2007)

_____________________

Between:

 THE CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF HONG KONG ALSO KNOWN AS THE BISHOP OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH IN HONG KONG INCORPORATION Applicant
(Applicant)
  - and -
 SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE Respondent
(Respondent)
_____________________
Appeal Committee: Chief Justice Ma, Mr Justice Bokhary PJ and
Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ
Date of Hearing:
Date of Determination:
13 December 2010
13 December 2010

________________________

D E T E R M I N A T I O N

________________________

 


Chief Justice Ma:

1.  We are satisfied that leave to appeal should be granted on the following question:

Are the provisions of sections 40BK(2) & (3)(a) and 40BU(2) & (3) of the Education Ordinance, Cap. 279, inconsistent with Article 136(1) and/or Article 137(1) and/or Article 141(3) of the Basic Law and therefore unconstitutional?




(Geoffrey Ma) (Kemal Bokhary) (R A V Ribeiro)
Chief Justice Permanent Judge Permanent Judge

Mr Martin Lee SC, Mr Erik Shum and Mr Hectar Pun (instructed by Messrs Wong, Hui & Co.) for the applicant

Mr Bernard Man (instructed by the Department of Justice) for the respondent