HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2010

HKSAR v. ARSHAD MUHAMMAD

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
74580-EN-2010-11-11

HKSAR v. ARSHAD MUHAMMAD

HTML content

HCMA 649/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 649 OF 2010

(ON APPEAL FROM STCC NO. 310 OF 2010)

____________

BETWEEN

HKSARRespondent
and
ARSHAD MUHAMMADAppellant

____________

Before: Hon Wright J in Court

Date of Hearing: 11 November 2010

Date of Judgment: 11 November 2010

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

1.  The Magistrate sentenced the appellant correctly and she gave the appellant a credit for the period he had been in administrative custody as well as an additional one-month credit.

2.  It seems that the Magistrate gave the appellant the extra credit because the work he was doing was simple.  The appellant was sentenced correctly.  His appeal is dismissed.

(A R Wright)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Appellant, in person, present

Ms Samantha Chiu, Public Prosecutor of Department of Justice, for the Respondent