HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2010

HKSAR v. KAU SZE WAI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
71892-EN-2010-06-29

HKSAR v. KAU SZE WAI

HTML content

HCMA 92/2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 92 OF 2010

(ON APPEAL FROM STCC 3916 OF 2009)

----------------------

BETWEEN  
 HKSARRespondent
 and 
 KAU SZE WAI (裘詩慧)Appellant

----------------------

Before:  The Honourable Mrs Justice V. Bokhary in Court

Date of Hearing:  29 June 2010

Date of Judgment:  29 June 2010

----------------------

J U D G M E N T

----------------------

 

1.  Having pleaded guilty before Ms L K Loh in the Magistrates’ Court to two charges of conspiracy to default by entering into bogus marriages, this Appellant was sentenced to a total of 16 months’ imprisonment.  It was by way of one-year terms on each charge with 4 months of the term on charge 2 being made consecutive to the term on charge 1.

2.  The Appellant gave the authorities some assistances before sentence and a good deal more after sentence.  She would have been the main prosecution witness if the person against whom she was due to give evidence had not pleaded guilty. 

3.  I do not think that the total sentence passed on her was wrong when it was passed, but she is now entitled to a considerable reduction for the assistance which she gave the authorities after she had been sentenced.

4.  She was released to bail after serving about 7 months’ imprisonment.  On the basis on her further assistance and in all the circumstances, I will reduce her total sentences so that she does not have to return to prison.  I will do this by allowing her appeal against sentence so as to reduce the term on each charge to 9 months’ imprisonment and make these terms wholly concurrent.

 (V. Bokhary)
 Judge of the Court of First Instance
 High Court

Mr Jonathan Acton-Bond, instructed by Messrs T H Koo & Associates  (assigned by the Legal Aid Department), for the Appellant

Miss Rosa Lo, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent