HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Criminal)2011

HKSAR v. WONG SUI CHING

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
79358-EN-2011-12-02

HKSAR v. WONG SUI CHING

HTML content

FAMC No. 47 of 2011

 

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 47 OF 2011 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM HCMA 730 OF 2010)

_____________________

Between:

  HKSAR Applicant
  - and -
  WONG SUI CHING Respondent

_____________________

 

Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ
Date of Hearing: 2 December 2011
Date of Determination: 2 December 2011

____________________________

D E T E R M I N A T I O N

_____________________________

 

Mr Justice Bokhary PJ :

1.  This is an application by the prosecution for leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal in order to pursue a point of law of great and general importance which it has formulated as follows:

“Whether pursuant to section 59(2)(a) of the Crimes Ordinance (Cap.200), property shall be treated as belonging to a person having the custody or control of it only if the custody or control is lawful?”

2.  We certify that point and grant the prosecution leave to appeal to the Court of Final Appeal to pursue it.

(Kemal Bokhary)
Permanent Judge
(Patrick Chan)
Permanent Judge
(RAV Ribeiro)
Permanent Judge

Mr William Tam (of the Department of Justice) for the applicant

Mr Jackson Poon and Mr Joseph Lee (instructed by Messrs Edmund W H Chow & Co.) for the respondent