HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2011

HKSAR v. KWAN ANDIS CHI TUNG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
77370-EN-2011-07-14

HKSAR v. KWAN ANDIS CHI TUNG

HTML content

HCMA 337/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 337 OF 2011

(ON APPEAL FROM ESS 47192 OF 2010)

____________

BETWEEN

 HKSARRespondent
and
 KWAN ANDIS CHI TUNG(關志東)Appellant

____________

Before: The Honourable Mrs Justice V. Bokhary in Court

Date of Hearing: 14 July 2011

Date of Judgment: 14 July 2011

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

1.  The Magistrate found, as it was justified on the evidence to find, that the Appellant, who held a United States passport and had lost his Hong Kong identity card, was in a street with neither his passport nor his identity card replacement form, both of which he had left at home. Despite everything urged to the contrary, I am of the view that there is no basis on which to disturb this conviction for failing to produce proof of identity on demand.

2.  It is a pity that the Appellant has thus acquired a conviction, and it should be said that it does not reflect on his character. In the result, however, I dismiss the appeal.

(V. Bokhary)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Appellant in person

Ms Peggy Leung, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent