HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2011

HKSAR v. GILLANI SYED RIZWAN AHMED

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
78745-EN-2011-09-20

HKSAR v. GILLANI SYED RIZWAN AHMED

HTML content

HCMA 487/2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO. 487 OF 2011

(ON APPEAL FROM ESCC 887 OF 2011)

____________

BETWEEN

 HKSARRespondent

and

 GILLANI SYED RIZWAN AHMEDAppellant

____________

Before: The Honourable Mrs Justice V. Bokhary in Court

Date of Hearing: 20 September 2011

Date of Judgment: 20 September 2011

_______________

J U D G M E N T

_______________

 

1.  The Appellant was convicted in the Magistrate’s Court on two charges. Charge 1 was of using an identity card relating to another person. Charge 2 was of breach of a condition of stay in that he took up employment in breach of a condition that he shall not take up employment. He now appeals against both convictions.

2.  There was evidence on which to convict on each charge, and I see no error in the way in which the Magistrate went about convicting on the evidence.  Accordingly the appeal is dismissed.

(V. Bokhary)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Appellant in person

Ms Winnie Mok, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent