HKSAR v. WONG KAM FUNG
HTML content
FAMC No. 10/2012
IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 10 OF 2012 (CRIMINAL)
(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM HCMA NO. 78 OF 2011)
_____________________
Between:
| HKSAR | Respondent | |
| - and - | ||
| WONG KAM FUNG | Applicant |
| _____________________ |
| Appeal Committee: | Mr Justice Bokhary PJ, Mr Justice Chan PJ and Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ |
| Date of Hearing: 6 July 2012 Date of Determination: 6 July 2012 |
_____________________
D E T E R M I N A T I O N
_____________________
Mr Justice Bokhary PJ :
1. In convicting of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, the magistrate accepted the victim’s evidence that the defendants had attacked her in the way which she described. The appeal judge felt unable to support that conclusion. So he quashed the convictions for assault occasioning actual bodily harm. But he noted that one of the defendants, who is now the applicant before us, had admitted in the witness-box that she had slapped the victim. Upon that admission, he substituted, in the case of the applicant, a conviction for common assault. There is no reason why the applicant should have made that admission unless it is true. And the appeal judge was entitled to take the view that the magistrate must have been satisfied of facts which proved the applicant guilty of common assault. That brings the case within s.119(1)(g) of the Magistrate Ordinance, Cap. 227.
2. We stress that all of that proceeds on the fact of the applicant having made an admission the truth of which there is no reason to doubt. It does not depend on what the magistrate said. As for the magistrate’s statement of findings, Mr Martin Lee SC for the applicant is of course correct that the magistrate’s course of referring to the notice of appeal and responding to it, which he did under a heading worded as “My response is as follows”, is to be deprecated.
3. In the result, despite the submissions forcefully made by Mr Lee with his customary ability, we do not consider this to be an appropriate case for an appeal to the Court of Final Appeal. Leave to bring such an appeal is accordingly refused.
| (Kemal Bokhary) Permanent Judge | (Patrick Chan) Permanent Judge | (RAV Ribeiro) Permanent Judge |
Mr Martin Lee SC and Ms Charleen Tong, instructed by ONC Lawyers, for the applicant
Mr Alex Lee and Ms Eva Chan, of the Department of Justice, for the respondent