HKSAR v. WONG TAK KEUNG
HTML content
FAMC No. 45 of 2014
IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 45 OF 2014 (CRIMINAL)
(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM CACC NO. 220 OF 2011)
________________________
BETWEEN
| HKSAR | Respondent | |
| And | ||
| WONG TAK KEUNG (黃得強) | Applicant |
________________________
Appeal Committee: Chief Justice Ma, Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ and Mr Justice Fok PJ
Date of Hearing and Determination: 12 August 2014
________________________
D E T E R M I N A T I O N
________________________
Chief Justice Ma:
1. On the applicant’s Notice of Motion for leave to appeal, we grant leave to appeal on the following questions of law, namely:
(1) Whether the principle that a court in Hong Kong has jurisdiction to try a crime ‘a substantial measure of the activities’ of which took place within [the] jurisdiction stated in HKSAR v Krieger and Another (CACC 99/2012, unrep., 18 December 2013, at §122) citing R v Smith (Wallace Duncan) [2004] QB 1418 at 1433H-1434B has the effect of extending the ambit of s.159A(3) of the Crimes Ordinance (Cap. 200) such that in a conspiracy to traffick unlawfully in dangerous drugs from Hong Kong to a place outside Hong Kong, any part of the conspiracy which, although considered on its own, is exclusively extraterritorial is triable in Hong Kong; and
(2) Whether an accused who participated only in a part of the conspiracy which, if considered on its own, is entirely extraterritorial can be tried and convicted of conspiracy under s.159A by a court in Hong Kong.
2. We also grant leave to appeal on the basis that it is reasonably arguable that the applicant’s conviction should be quashed on the ground that, in upholding the conviction, the Court of Appeal expanded the scope of the conspiracy from a conspiracy having one objective to one with multiple objectives and that this expansion gave rise to procedural unfairness.
| (Geoffrey Ma) Chief Justice | (R.A.V. Ribeiro) Permanent Judge | (Joseph Fok) Permanent Judge |
Ms Margaret Ng and Mr Kay K.W. Chan, instructed by Alan Ho & Co., for the Applicant
Mr Martin Hui SADPP and Mr Ivan Cheung PP, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent