中國遠洋運輸(集團)總公司 (前稱中國遠洋運輸總公司) v. WANG HU alias WON SO FOO AND OTHERS
HTML content
HCMP 852/2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO852 OF 2014
____________
IN THE MATTER of the Deferred Shares in OCEAN TRAMPING COMPANY, LIMITED | |
and | |
IN THE MATTER of Section 52 of the Trustee Ordinance, Cap 29 |
_____________
BETWEEN | ||
| 中國遠洋運輸(集團)總公司 (前稱中國遠洋運輸總公司) | Plaintiff | |
and | ||
| WANG HU alias WON SO FOO (汪滸別名汪索福) | 1st Defendant | |
| KAM WING KAI alias LIU TUNG PING (金永佳別名劉東萍) | 2nd Defendant | |
| LI PAIO alias LEU SEN NAM (李彪別名柳心男) | 3rd Defendant | |
| LU XIAN WANG alias LIU CHANG (呂先旺別名劉誠) | 4th Defendant | |
| TSANG KWOK KIU alias SUN CHONG YIN (曾閣橋別名孫仲穎) | 5th Defendant | |
| CHE BING JIU alias CHEN KAU WEI (車炳久別名陳高為) | 6th Defendant | |
| ZHENG TAO alias CHENG MIN HWEU (鄭濤別名鄭明慧) | 7th Defendant | |
| NG FAI alias CHIH YUNG PAO (吳輝別名池原普) | 8th Defendant | |
| YU YOU GANG alias FUNG HAI CHIN (余有剛別名馮海清) | 9th Defendant | |
_____________
| Before: Hon Au-Yeung J in Chambers |
| Date of Hearing:18 December 2014 |
| Date of Judgment: 18 December 2014 |
_______________
J U D G M E N T
_______________
1. This is an application by the plaintiff for vesting orders against 9 defendants as trustees for shares to be returned to the plaintiff under section 52(1) of the Trustee Ordinance, Cap 29.
2. The defendants hold a total of 80,500 deferred shares in Ocean Tramping Company, Limited (“the shares”) particularized as follows:
Defendant No of shares 1st 8,000 2nd 9,500 3rd 8,000 4th 9,500 5th 9,500 6th 9,500 7th 9,500 8th 9,000 9th 8,000
3. The defendants have respectively executed declarations of trust dated 30 October 1990 attested before a Hong Kong solicitor declaring that they hold the shares on trust for the plaintiff. The original share certificates have been kept by the plaintiff. The defendants have not participated in the affairs of Ocean Tramping.
4. By letters dated 23 January 2014, the plaintiff’s solicitors demanded each defendant to contact the former to arrange for transfer of the shares under his name to the plaintiff within 28 days. The letters were sent to the last known address of each of the defendants (“collectively the last known addresses”) stated on the declarations of trust. The letter to D1 was marked “moved out”. The one to D2 was marked “refuse to accept”. The ones to D3, D6, D7 and D9 were returned. The ones to D4, D5 and D8 met with no response.
5. The plaintiff has lost contact with the defendants. Searches have been made at the Births and Deaths Registry (covering 30/10/1990 to 4/5/2014) but no record of the defendants’ death was found.
6. Diligent attempts to serve the court process have been made at the last known addresses, including by registered post (all unclaimed), paying actual visits, making enquiries with neighbours and caretaker’s office (where available) and land searches of the properties at the last known addresses.
7. Pursuant to the order of Master M Wong, substituted service of these proceedings and the notice of appointment was effected by an advertisement in the Sing Dao Daily, together with service by ordinary post and insertion into the letter box at the last known addresses. Accordingly, I can proceed under section 58 of the Trustee Ordinance to hear this case in the absence of the defendant.
8. It is clear that the defendants have been holding the shares on trust for the plaintiff under an express trust. The trustees cannot now be found and have neglected to transfer the shares to the plaintiff for 28 days after the written request for transfer was made. Pursuant to section 52(1)(b)(iii) and (iv) of the Trustee Ordinance, I order that:
(1) the right to transfer the deferred shares registered in the name of each of the defendant in Ocean Tramping Company, Limited and the right to receive the dividends accrued or to accrue thereon prior to the transfer of the share be vested in the plaintiff;
(2) the plaintiff may thereafter transfer the shares to itself or to any other person or entity as the plaintiff may desire; and
(3) there be no order as to costs.
9. I thank counsel for his assistance.
| (Queeny Au-Yeung) | |
| Judge of the Court of First Instance | |
| High Court |
Mr Sunny Chan, instructed by Eddie Lee & Company, for the plaintiff
The defendants were not represented and did not appear