HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Criminal)2015

HKSAR v. TSE MAN FEI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
102470-EN-2016-02-01

HKSAR v. TSE MAN FEI

HTML content

FAMC No. 40 of 2015

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 40 OF 2015 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM

HCMA NO. 208 OF 2015)

_____________________

BETWEEN:

 HKSAR
Applicant
 and
 TSE MAN FEI ( 謝文飛)
Respondent

_____________________

Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Tang PJ and Mr Justice Fok PJ
Date of Hearing and Determination: 1 February 2016

_____________________________

DETERMINATION

______________________________

 

Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ :

1.  We grant leave to appeal on a point of law which we certify in the following terms:

“In the context of a prosecution for an offence of displaying a poster on Government land without written permission of the Authority (contrary to sections 104A(1)(b), 104A(2) and 150 of the Public Health and Municipal Services Ordinance, Cap. 132), what act or conduct by a defendant must the prosecution prove in order to satisfy the element of ‘displaying’?”

2.  We refuse leave to appeal on the proposed “substantial and grave injustice” basis relying on the doctrine of joint enterprise.

3.  The appeal will be heard on 7 June 2016.

(R.A.V. Ribeiro)(Robert Tang)(Joseph Fok)
Permanent JudgePermanent JudgePermanent Judge

Mr Raymond Cheng SPP, of the Department of Justice, for the Applicant

Mr Jackson Poon, instructed by ONC Lawyers, assigned by the Director of Legal Aid, for the Respondent