HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Constitutional and Administrative Law Proceedings2015

JV AND ANOTHER v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]

Related cases with same parties

  • HCAL100/2022MOSTOFA MD v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1002/2022VILLAREAL ESPERANZA VALDEZ v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1005/2024TACTAY DANITAS TUBOG v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1007/2022UMI SITI SURIFAH v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1007/2025RANA MINA v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1008/2021FATAJO ABDOULIE v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1008/2022ESQUILLO RIAH MAE ORDIZ v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1009/2022VICTOR VITUS CHIZOBA v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1010/2022DARBOE LANSANA v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1011/2025SEIKH NIZAMUDDIN alias SK NIZAMUDDIN v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL101/2022SIDDIQUE AAMIR v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1014/2022NWADOBE CHINATU ELVIS v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1016/2021RAZU NAZMUL HASAN v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1017/2021ALI SAFDAR v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1017/2022TRAN THI THUY QUYNH v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1018/2024KHYBAR v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1018/2025LASMINI AND ANOTHER v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL10/2023FERNANDEZ LONILYN MABASA v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1024/2021NGUYEN THI NHUNG v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
  • HCAL1024/2022NAHID MOHAMMAD v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]
[2020] HKCFI 1973-EN-2020-08-06

JV AND ANOTHER v. DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION [Decision on Leave Application]

HTML content

HCAL215/2015

[2020] HKCFI 1973

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST No. 215 of 2015

BETWEEN

JV1st Applicant
AR, a female minor,
By her mother and next friend, JV
2nd Applicant
and
Director of ImmigrationProposed Respondent

     Application for Leave to Apply for Judicial Review

NOTIFICATION of the Judge’s decision (Ord. 53 r. 3)

Following;

   consideration of the documents only;   or
   consideration of the documents and oral submissions by counsel for the Applicant
in open court and the letter from the Applicants dated 5 August 2020;

Order by The Honourable Mr. Justice Au, Justice of Appeal (sitting as additional Judge of the Court of First Instance) :

1. The Application for leave to apply for judicial review be dismissed with no order as to costs; and

2. The Applicants' own costs be taxed in accordance with the Legal Aid Regulations.

Observations for the Applicant :

Nil.

Dated  6th day of August 2020.

 

(Yolanda Chan)
for Registrar, High Court

Where leave to apply has been granted, Applicants and their legal advisers are reminded of their obligation to reconsider the merits of their application in the light of the Respondent’s evidence




Notesfor the Applicant:

If leave has been granted, the Applicant or his solicitors must: 
    
a) serve on the respondent and such interested parties as may be directed by the Court the order granting leave and any directions given within 14 days after the leave was granted(Order 53, rule 4A);
Sent to the Applicants’ solicitors on
 7 August 2020
Daly & Associates
Solicitors for the Applicants
3rd Floor, Yam Tze Commercial Building,
23 Thomson Road,
Wanchai,HONG KONG 
Sent to the Proposed Respondent on 7 August 2020

Director of Immigration
Immigration Department
Ref: RBCL/1979/09

Senior Assistant Law Officer
(Civil Law)
(Civil Litigation Unit)2
Department of Justice 
b) issue the originating summons within 14 days after the grant of leave and serve it in accordance with Order 53, rule 5; and

c) supply to every other party copies of every affidavit which the Applicant proposes to use at the hearing, including the affidavit in support of the application for leave (Order 53, rule 6(5)).
Applicant’s ref. no: 6294-LAD 



Form CALL-1