MR MIZANUR RAHM v. MS MARY YUEN, ESQ.
HTML content
HCAL 2/2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
CONSTITUTIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE LAW LIST
NO. 2 OF 2017
___________________________
| BETWEEN | ||
| Mr Mizanur Rahman | Applicant | |
| And | ||
| Ms Mary Yuen, ESQ. | Respondent | |
| And | ||
| Director Of Immigration | Interested Party | |
___________________________
Before: Hon Anthony Chan J in Court
Date of Hearing: 25 May 2017
Date of Decision: 25 May 2017
_______________
D E C I S I O N
_______________
1. The Applicant has failed to appear this morning to prosecute his leave application.
2. In any event, I am unable to find any merit in this application. The Applicant was found to be an unreliable witness by the Appeal Board, and the Board was not satisfied that any of his 3 claims (risk of torture, risk of torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment and risk of persecution) had been made out. I see no reasonably arguable challenge to the decision of the Appeal Board.
3. I therefore dismiss this application.
| (Anthony Chan) Judge of the Court of First Instance High Court |
The Applicant was not represented and did not appear