LIM HANG YOUNG v. L&A INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LTD AND ANOTHER
HTML content
HCCW 169/2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
COMPANIES WINDING‑UP PROCEEDINGS NO 169 OF 2017
___________________
| IN THE MATTER of L&A International Holdings Limited | |
| and | |
| IN THE MATTER of section 327(3)(c) of the Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance, Cap 32 |
___________________
| BETWEEN | ||
| LIM HANG YOUNG | Petitioner | |
| and | ||
| L&A INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS LIMITED | 1st Respondent | |
| YANG’S HOLDINGS CAPITAL LIMITED | 2nd Respondent | |
___________________
| Before: Hon Harris J in Chambers |
| Date of Hearing: 14 November 2017 |
| Date of Decision: 14 November 2017 |
____________________
D E C I S I O N
____________________
1. On 6 June 2017 the petitioner, Lim Hang Young, issued a petition seeking a winding-up order against the 1st respondent (“Company”), which is listed on the GEM Board of the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited, and the 2nd respondent, the majority shareholder of the Company. In short, serious mismanagement is alleged.
2. The petitioner, who is Korean, did not appear on the first hearing of the petition and has not appeared today on the hearing of a summons issued on 16 August 2017 seeking an order striking out the petition against both respondents.
3. The summons and evidence were served at the petitioner’s address as it appears in the petition.
4. I will strike out the petition and make an order that the petitioner pays the 1st and 2nd respondents’ costs. In my view, given the petitioner’s complete inactivity following presentation of petition, it is appropriate that those costs be assessed on an indemnity basis which I so order.
5. I note that the Companies Court has had a series of petitions to deal with in the last couple of years which involve Korean petitioners issuing similar petitions to wind up small listed companies on the grounds of misconduct. It is unclear what their motivation is, but it might be prudent for this to be brought to the attention of the Securities and Futures Commission in order that they can ensure that it does not involve any market manipulation.
| (Jonathan Harris) | |
| Judge of the Court of First Instance High Court |
The petitioner was not represented and did not appear
Mr Joseph Wong, instructed by Khoo & Co, for the 1st respondent
Mr Kung Kin Chung, instructed by Lam & Co, for the 2nd respondent
Attendance of the Official Receiver was excused