HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Criminal)2018

HKSAR v. CHU TSUN WAI

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
[2018] HKCFA 40-EN-2018-08-22

HKSAR v. CHU TSUN WAI

HTML content

FAMC No.35 of 2018

[2018] HKCFA 40

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 35 OF 2018 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM
HCMA NO. 454 OF 2016)

_______________________

BETWEEN

 HKSARRespondent
 and
 CHU TSUN WAI (朱峻瑋)Applicant

_______________________

Appeal Committee : Chief Justice Ma, Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ and Mr Justice Tang PJ
Date of Hearing and Determination : 22 August 2018

_______________________

DETERMINATION

_______________________

Chief Justice Ma:

1.  We are satisfied that leave to appeal should be granted in respect of the following questions of law, namely:

Question 1

Whether requests to access a website server at a level that does not affect or slow down the function of the website, are sufficient to satisfy the definition of “misuse of computer” under section 59(1A)(a) of the Crimes Ordinance (Cap 200), namely “to cause a computer to function other than as it has been established to function by or on behalf of its owner”.

Question 2

Whether a request to access a website server which generates a server log of the request constitutes “misuse of computer” under section 59(1A)(c) of the Crimes Ordinance, as coming within the definition “to add any program or data to the contents of a computer or of a computer storage medium”.

2.  We also consider it reasonably arguable that leave to appeal should be granted on the substantial and grave injustice basis on the footing that a conviction on the basis of section 59(1A)(c) was in the circumstances procedurally unfair and deprived the applicant of a fair trial.

3.  The appeal will be heard on 8 January 2019.

  

  

(Geoffrey Ma)
Chief Justice
(R A V Ribeiro)
Permanent Judge
(Robert Tang)
Permanent Judge

  

Mr Randy Shek and Mr Chow Ho Kiu, instructed by Eric Yu & Company, for the Applicant

Mr Ned Lai SADPP and Ms Mickey Fung SPP, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent