HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Criminal)2018

SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHENG KA YEE AND OTHERS

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1997SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. WONG KWONG FEI and Another
  • CAAR10/1998SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. HUI SIU MAN, RICKY
  • CAAR10/2007SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHOI SUI HEY
  • CAAR10/2010SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. AMINA MARIAM BOKHARY
  • CAAR10/2011SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. YAN SHEN
  • CAAR10/2021SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHAN KIN PONG BONNY
  • CAAR11/2001SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHEUNG CHUN-CHIN & OTHERS
  • CAAR11/2006SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHUNG YUI HUNG
  • CAAR11/2007SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. MA KWAI CHUN
  • CAAR11/2010SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHAN CHUN FAI
  • CAAR11/2011SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. KAN BRIAN PING CHEE
  • CAAR11/2021SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. PASTANA CARVALHO ANDREZA NARELY
  • CAAR11/2022SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. TAM YING YUEN
  • CAAR1/1999SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. KWAN CHI CHEONG AND OTHERS
  • CAAR1/2002SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHAN BOON NING
  • CAAR1/2003SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. TSO TSZ KIN
  • CAAR1/2004SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. WONG KWOK KAU
  • CAAR1/2005SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. LI MAN TAK AND OTHERS
  • CAAR1/2006SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHAU WAN FUN
  • CAAR1/2007SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHIU CHUN WAI AND ANOTHER
[2018] HKCFA 49-EN-2018-11-02

SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHENG KA YEE AND OTHERS

HTML content

FAMC No. 51 of 2018

[2018] HKCFA 49

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 51 OF 2018 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM HCMA NO. 466 OF 2017)

____________________

BETWEEN

 SECRETARY FOR JUSTICEApplicant
 and
 CHENG KA YEE(鄭嘉儀)1st Respondent
 TSANG WING SHAN(曾詠珊)2nd Respondent
 WONG PUI MAN(黃佩雯)3rd Respondent
 U LENG KOK (余玲菊)4th Respondent

____________________

Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Fok PJ and Mr Justice Cheung PJ
Date of Hearing and Determination: 2 November 2018

_________________________

D E T E R M I N A T I O N

_________________________

Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ:

1.  We are satisfied that leave should be granted on the basis that a point of law of the requisite importance is involved in this case, namely:

“What is the scope of the actus reus of the offence under section 161(1)(c) of the Crimes Ordinance (Cap 200)? In particular, is it restricted to the unauthorized extraction and use of information from a computer?”

2.  We are also satisfied that leave should be granted on the substantial and grave injustice basis for the appellant to contend, subject to the conclusion reached as to the foregoing point of law, that it is reasonably arguable that the finding as to lack of dishonesty was perverse.

3.  The appeal will be heard on 26 February 2019.

  

  

(R A V Ribeiro)
Permanent Judge
(Joseph Fok)
Permanent Judge
(Andrew Cheung)
Permanent Judge

  

Mr David Leung, SC, DPP, Mr Robert Lee, SADPP and Ms Kasmine Hui, SPP (Ag), of the Department of Justice, for the Applicant

Mr David Boyton, instructed by T K Tsui & Co., for the 1st and 4th Respondents

Mr Duncan Percy, instructed by Kenneth W Leung & Co., for the 2nd Respondent

Mr James Tze, instructed by Raymond Luk & Co., for the 3rd Respondent