HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Civil Action2018

EMPIRE WISDOM LTD v. MAK CHUNG FU AND OTHERS

[2020] HKCFI 54-EN-2020-01-02

EMPIRE WISDOM LTD v. MAK CHUNG FU AND OTHERS

HTML content

HCA 821/2018

[2020] HKCFI 54

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 821 OF 2018

____________

BETWEEN

 EMPIRE WISDOM LIMITED
(君睿有限公司)
Plaintiff

and

 MAK CHUNG FU (麥中富)1st Defendant
 LO PUI YU (盧沛如)2nd Defendant
 LAU CHUNG HOI (劉聰海)3rd Defendant
 TOP FAMOUS CONSTRUCTION HOLDINGS LIMITED
(成達建築控股有限公司)
4th Defendant

____________

Before: Deputy High Court Judge Paul Lam SC in Chambers

Date of Hearing: 9 December 2019

Date of Decision: 9 December 2019

Date of Reasons for Decision: 2 January 2020

________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION

________________________


1.  The plaintiff applied for summary judgment against the 1st and 2nd defendants for sums due and payable under guarantees executed by them. The Master granted conditional leave to defend. Both the plaintiff, and the 1st and 2nd defendants, appealed against the Master’s decision. This is the hearing of their appeals.

2.  The 1st and 2nd defendants were absent at this hearing.  I therefore dismissed their appeal.

3.  As the 1st and 2nd defendants failed to comply with the condition imposed by the Master, judgment had already been entered against them. Hence, I granted leave to the plaintiff to withdraw its appeal.

4.  As to costs, I ordered that the costs of and incidental to the notices of appeal filed by the plaintiff, and the 1st and 2nd defendants (including the costs of this hearing) be paid by the 1st and 2nd defendants to the plaintiff.  I assessed the costs summarily at HK$300,000.

 (Paul Lam SC)
 Deputy High Court Judge

Mr Vincent Chen, instructed by Ince & Co, for the plaintiff

Both the 1st and 2nd defendants were not represented and did not appear