HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Criminal)2020

SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. LEUNG KWOK HUNG

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR10/1997SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. WONG KWONG FEI and Another
  • CAAR10/1998SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. HUI SIU MAN, RICKY
  • CAAR10/2007SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHOI SUI HEY
  • CAAR10/2010SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. AMINA MARIAM BOKHARY
  • CAAR10/2011SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. YAN SHEN
  • CAAR10/2021SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHAN KIN PONG BONNY
  • CAAR11/2001SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHEUNG CHUN-CHIN & OTHERS
  • CAAR11/2006SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHUNG YUI HUNG
  • CAAR11/2007SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. MA KWAI CHUN
  • CAAR11/2010SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHAN CHUN FAI
  • CAAR11/2011SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. KAN BRIAN PING CHEE
  • CAAR11/2021SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. PASTANA CARVALHO ANDREZA NARELY
  • CAAR11/2022SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. TAM YING YUEN
  • CAAR1/1999SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. KWAN CHI CHEONG AND OTHERS
  • CAAR1/2002SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHAN BOON NING
  • CAAR1/2003SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. TSO TSZ KIN
  • CAAR1/2004SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. WONG KWOK KAU
  • CAAR1/2005SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. LI MAN TAK AND OTHERS
  • CAAR1/2006SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHAU WAN FUN
  • CAAR1/2007SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. CHIU CHUN WAI AND ANOTHER
[2021] HKCFA 7-EN-2021-03-09

SECRETARY FOR JUSTICE v. LEUNG KWOK HUNG

HTML content

FAMC No. 20 of 2020

[2021] HKCFA 7

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 20 OF 2020 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM

HCMA NO. 520 OF 2018)

________________________

BETWEEN  
 SECRETARY FOR JUSTICERespondent
 and 
 LEUNG KWOK HUNGApplicant

________________________

Appeal Committee: Chief Justice Cheung, Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ and Mr Justice Fok PJ
Date of Hearing and Determination: 9 March 2021

________________________

DETERMINATION

________________________

Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ:

1.  We grant leave to appeal in respect of the following questions of law, namely:

(1) Whether what is said and done during proceedings of the Legislative Council (“LegCo”) and its committees falls within the privilege enjoyed by LegCo provided that it does not amount to an ordinary criminal offence. (‘Question 1’)

(2) Upon the true interpretation of the Legislative Council (Powers and Privileges) Ordinance, Cap 382 (“LCPPO”):

(a) Whether section 17(c) applies to a member of LegCo. (‘Question 2(a)’)

(b) Whether ‘proceedings’ in section 17(c) is confined to proceedings involving the taking of evidence under oath. (‘Question 2(b)’)

(3) Whether the Court of Appeal was correct in respect of the following:

(a) That the absolute freedom of speech and debate of LegCo under section 3 of the LCPPO does not extend to conduct caught by section 17(c) of the LCPPO. (‘Question 3(a)’)

(b) That LegCo had, by enacting section 17(c) of the LCPPO, in fact relinquished to and/or conferred upon the courts a penal jurisdiction over the conduct and discipline of members of LegCo during the proceedings of LegCo and its committees. (‘Question 3(b)’)

(c) That section 17(c) of the LCPPO as applicable to a member of LegCo is not unconstitutional. (‘Question 3(c)’).

2.  The appeal will be listed for hearing on 31 August 2021.

(Andrew Cheung)(R A V Ribeiro)(Joseph Fok)
Chief JusticePermanent JudgePermanent Judge

  

Lord David Philip Pannick, QC and Ms Margaret Ng, instructed by Ho Tse Wai & Partners, assigned by the Director of Legal Aid, Mr Carter Chim and Mr Jason Lee, instructed by Ho Tse Wai & Partners, on a pro bono basis, for the Applicant

Ms Vinci Lam, DDPP and Mr Antony Leung, SPP, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent