HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Civil Action2021

RORY ANTHONY CAFFYN-PARSONS AND ANOTHER v. ASIA GRACE LTD AND OTHERS

[2022] HKCFI 2041-EN-2022-07-05

RORY ANTHONY CAFFYN-PARSONS AND ANOTHER v. ASIA GRACE LTD AND OTHERS

HTML content

HCA 1400/2021

[2022] HKCFI 2041

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

ACTION NO 1400 OF 2021

_____________

BETWEEN  
 RORY ANTHONY CAFFYN-PARSONS1st Plaintiff
 ELIZABETH JANE MOWATT2nd Plaintiff
 and 
 ASIA GRACE LIMITED1st Defendant
 GBES ASIA LIMITED 2nd Defendant
 ALLIED PROSPER INTERNATIONAL LIMITED3rd Defendant
 H. KIEL LIMITED
(TRADING AS MONARCH INTERNATIONAL) LENTUS LIMITED
4th Defendant
 HK TRADERS LIMITED 6th Defendant
 RSM WORLDWIDE LIMITED 7th Defendant
 PARVESH GUPTA
(TRADING AS I-RIVER (HK) INTERNATIONAL)
8th Defendant
 GLOBAL METAL RESOURCES LIMITED9th Defendant
 GREAT MEGA HOLDINGS LIMITED10th Defendant
 SUNSHINE GRACE GENERAL TRADING COMPANY LIMITED 11th Defendant

_____________

Before:  Mr Recorder Manzoni SC in Chambers

Date of Decision:  5 July 2022

_______________

D E C I S I O N

_______________

1.  By Summons dated 2 June 2022 the Plaintiffs sought the discharge as against the 7th and 11th Defendants of certain injunctions that it had obtained against them before Deputy High Court Judge Winne Tsui on 16 September 2021, and the discharge of an injunction order, against the 5th Defendant that had been continued by order of Mr Justice K Yeung dated 8 October 2021. It also sought no order for costs.

2.  By letter dated 15 June 2022 the Plaintiffs’ solicitors sought directions that the matter be dealt with on the papers, and that a hearing due on 5 July 2022 before me be vacated. By directions given on 29 June 2022 I gave those directions. Having considered the papers, this is now my determination.

3.  Having considered the 6th affirmation of Cheung Wing Hing Harris, I am satisfied that service of the inter partes Summons dated 2 June 2022 has been properly served on the 5th, 7th and 11th Defendants.

4.  Having considered the 6th Affidavit of Li Lok Hin Daniel I am satisfied that the injunction orders should be discharged as against the 5th, 7th and 11th Defendants. As to costs, as it is clear that Garnishee Orders absolute have been obtained against each of the 5th, 7th and 11th defendants, and that the Garnishee monies have since been paid, in my view it is also appropriate that the injunctions should be discharged with no order for costs.

5.  In the circumstances I make an order in the terms of the Summons dated 2 June 2022.

  (Charles Manzoni SC)
Recorder of the High Court

Written submissions from Messrs Tanner De Witt, for the 1st and 2nd Plaintiffs

No submissions from the 5th, 7th and 11th Defendants, all unrepresented