HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Magistracy Appeal2021

HKSAR v. SANNI IBRAHIM MOUTAWAKILOU

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
[2022] HKCFI 2022-EN-2022-06-30

HKSAR v. SANNI IBRAHIM MOUTAWAKILOU

HTML content

HCMA 556/2021

[2022] HKCFI 2022

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MAGISTRACY APPEAL NO 556 OF 2021

(ON APPEAL FROM TMCC 1139 OF 2021)

________________

BETWEEN  
 HKSARRespondent
 and 
 SANNI IBRAHIM MOUTAWAKILOUAppellant

________________

Before:  Hon Campbell-Moffat J in Court

Date of Hearing:  30 June 2022

Date of Judgment:  30 June 2022

________________

J U D G M E N T

________________

1.  The appellant was found guilty after trial of one count of going equipped for stealing, contrary to s27(1) of the Theft Ordinance, Cap 210 on 9 November 2021 before Mr Jeffrey Sze, Magistrate and was sentenced on the same day to a period of imprisonment of four months. By his Notice of Appeal dated 16 November 2021, he seeks to appeal conviction alone. He has since served his sentence. Despite the best efforts of Ms Liza Li and the Legal Aid Department, the appellant has failed to communicate with them and has not attended today.

2.  Accordingly, this appeal against conviction is dismissed. The appellant is a Form 8 holder, there will be no order as to costs.

  (A P Campbell‑Moffat)
Judge of the Court of First Instance
High Court

Ms Kathy Sum, PP of the Department of Justice, for the respondent

Mr Liza Li, instructed by the Director of Legal Aid, for the appellant