HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Criminal)2022

HKSAR v. CHOY KIN YUE (蔡健瑜)

Related cases with same parties

  • CAAR11/1997HKSAR v. YIP CHI TUNG
  • CAAR1/1998HKSAR v. LING VERONICA
  • CAAR12/1996HKSAR v. WONG KWONG YICK
  • CAAR6/1998HKSAR v. LAU SHIU KONG AND ANOTHER
  • CAAR6/2012HKSAR v. LEUNG KWOK CHI
  • CAAR9/2001HKSAR v. WONG TO LEUNG
  • CACC100/1997HKSAR v. YU HON CHUN
  • CACC100/1999HKSAR v. LAM CHI KIN
  • CACC100/2000HKSAR v. SHING KUEN KIN
  • CACC100/2001HKSAR v. OU YANG MING CHYUAN
  • CACC100/2002HKSAR v. CHAN LAI SING AND ANOTHER
  • CACC100/2003HKSAR v. CHENG CHONG SHING
  • CACC100/2022HKSAR v. LIMBU PRASHANT
  • CACC101/1997HKSAR v. YIU KENNETH LIK KIN
  • CACC101/2001HKSAR v. LEUNG KWAI PING
  • CACC101/2021HKSAR v. WONG CHI FUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/1997HKSAR v. MAN KAM SHING
  • CACC10/1998HKSAR v. CHAN CHUN TAK
  • CACC10/2001HKSAR v. TAM KWAI KEUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACC10/2002HKSAR v. WONG WAN SHAN
[2022] HKCFA 14-EN-2022-07-11

HKSAR v. CHOY KIN YUE (蔡健瑜)

HTML content

FAMC No. 11 of 2022

[2022] HKCFA 14

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 11 OF 2022 (CRIMINAL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL

FROM HCMA NO. 421 OF 2021)

___________________________

BETWEEN  
 HKSARApplicant
 and 
 CHOY KIN YUE (蔡健瑜) (D5)Respondent

___________________________

Appeal Committee: Mr Justice Fok PJ, Mr Justice Lam PJ and Mr Justice Stock NPJ

Date of Hearing and Determination: 11 July 2022

___________________________

D E T E R M I N A T I O N

___________________________

The Appeal Committee:

1.  We are satisfied that it is reasonably arguable that, in allowing the respondent’s appeal against his conviction for taking part in an unlawful assembly on the ground that it was not an irresistible inference that the respondent had the necessary participatory intent for the offence, the judge misapplied this Court’s judgment in HKSAR v Lo Kin Man[2021] HKCFA 37.

2.  Accordingly, we grant leave to the appellant to appeal against the judgment below on the ground that it is reasonably arguable that, in allowing the magistracy appeal and quashing the respondent’s conviction, substantial and grave injustice has been done.

3.  The appeal will be listed to be heard on 29 November 2022.

(Joseph Fok)
Permanent Judge
(M H Lam)
Permanent Judge
(Frank Stock)
Non-Permanent Judge

Mr Ivan Cheung ADPP (Ag) and Ms Jennifer Tsui SPP (Ag), of the Department of Justice, for the Applicant

Mr Brian Tsui, instructed by Chak & Associates LLP, for the Respondent