HKSAR v. CHAN CHU LEUNG (陳柱良)
HTML content
FAMC No. 52 of 2022
[2023] HKCFA 23
IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE
HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION
MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 52 OF 2022 (CRIMINAL)
(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL FROM
CACC NO. 160 OF 2010)
_______________________
BETWEEN | ||
| HKSAR | Respondent | |
| and | ||
| CHAN CHU LEUNG (陳柱良) | Applicant | |
_______________________
| Appeal Committee: | Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Fok PJ and Mr Justice Lam PJ |
| Date of Hearing and Determination: | 7 August 2023 |
__________________________________
DETERMINATION
__________________________________
Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ:
1. We refuse leave to appeal in relation to the applicant’s complaints concerning the “1st impugned cross-examination” involving one “Ah Chu” and the Judge’s direction in respect thereof, referred to in his Form B leave application dated 21 November 2022.
2. We are satisfied that points of law of great and general importance are involved in the decision and grant leave to appeal in respect of the following Question, namely:
“When it is common ground that a defendant has maintained his pre-trial right to silence, is it permissible for the prosecution to question or make use of:
(a) the defendant’s pre-trial lack of or late complaint regarding police impropriety during the investigation giving rise to the charge?
(b) the defendant’s pre-trial lack of or late disclosure, whether in the form of a complaint or not, about a matter other than ‘the occurrence of an offence, the identity of the participants and the roles which they played’ but nonetheless addressing a piece of incriminating evidence?”
3. Leave to appeal in respect of the aforesaid Question is confined to the applicant’s complaints arising out of the “2nd impugned cross-examination” involving evidence of florescent powder referred to in the aforementioned Form B.
4. We also grant leave to appeal on the substantial and grave injustice basis, in the event that an infringement of the applicant’s right of silence is established, regarding the issue whether any such infringement was cured by the Judge’s direction to the jury.
5. This appeal will be listed for hearing on 28 November 2023.
| (R A V Ribeiro) Permanent Judge | (Joseph Fok) Permanent Judge | (M H Lam) Permanent Judge |
Mr Shahmim K. Khattak (Kelly Lam), Mr Anthony Lai and Mr Chris Chan, instructed by Poon & Cheung, for the Applicant
Mr Ned Lai, DDPP (Ag.) and Mr Marcus Lee, SPP, of the Department of Justice, for the Respondent