HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings (Civil)2024

SO KWAI CHUNG V. WONG WAI YING ANITA AND OTHERS

Related cases with same parties

  • CACV1/2023WONG WAI YING ANITA AND OTHERS v. SO KWAI CHUNG AND ANOTHER
  • CACV498/2022WONG WAI YING ANITA AND OTHERS v. SO KWAI CHUNG AND ANOTHER
  • FACV12/2024SO KWAI CHUNG v. WONG WAI YING ANITA AND OTHERS
  • HCA2580/2018WONG WAI YING ANITA AND OTHERS v. SO KWAI CHUNG AND ANOTHER
[2024] HKCFA 28-EN-2024-10-28

SO KWAI CHUNG V. WONG WAI YING ANITA AND OTHERS

HTML content

FAMV No. 101 of 2024

[2024] HKCFA 28

IN THE COURT OF FINAL APPEAL OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 101 OF 2024 (CIVIL)

(ON APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
FROM CACV NO. 498 OF 2022)

___________________________

BETWEEN

 WONG WAI YING ANITA1st Plaintiff
  (1st Respondent)
 TANG CHOI WOON2nd Plaintiff
  (2nd Respondent)
 WONG WAI SHAN3rd Plaintiff
  (3rd Respondent)
 and 
 SO KWAI CHUNG1st Defendant
  (Applicant)
 WONG MING KWONG2nd Defendant

___________________________

Appeal Committee:Mr Justice Ribeiro PJ, Mr Justice Fok PJ and Mr Justice Lam PJ
Date of Hearing and Determination:28 October 2024

___________________________

D E T E R M I N A T I O N

___________________________

The Appeal Committee:

1.  We are satisfied that the following questions are of the requisite importance and grant leave to appeal in respect of the same, namely:

Whether the act and/or representation by one co-owner (“A”) can give rise to an easement in respect of the whole property in favour of a third party (“TP”) being created or “granted” by a proprietary estoppel which binds the other co-owner (“B”) who was not involved in, and had no knowledge of, the discussions and dealings between A and TP (“Question 1”);

If the answer to Question 1 is “no”, what is the legal significance of B’s knowledge that TP had been using the property for access and the long lapse of time before B took action to block the access. In particular, whether B’s knowing inaction can give rise to a proprietary estoppel by way of acquiescence as against B (“Question 2”).

2.  The appeal will be listed for hearing on 7 April 2025.

(R A V Ribeiro)
Permanent Judge
(Joseph Fok)
Permanent Judge
(M H Lam)
Permanent Judge

Mr Michael Lok and Ms Valerie Kwok, instructed by Ho & Partners, for the 1st Defendant (Applicant)

Mr Sunny Chan, instructed by K C Ho & Fong, for the 1st to 3rd Plaintiffs (1st to 3rd Respondents)