HK CourtDB
HomeDirectoryMCP
Hong Kong CourtDB
Back to directory
Miscellaneous Proceedings2020

THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER v. LAM CHUN HING

Related cases with same parties

  • CACV125/1985FEDERAL ENTERPRISES CO LTD v. THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER
  • CACV126/1989STANDARD CHARTERED BANK AND ANOTHER v. THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER
  • CACV202/2011THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER v. CHAN KIN HANG DANVIL
  • CACV222/2007THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER v. CHAN HING TO
  • CACV269/1998THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER v. POA KWOK HO ALEXANDER
  • CACV271/2006LEUNG YAT TUNG v. THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER
  • CACV367/2005THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER v. WILLIAM NICHOLAS GILES AND ANOTHER
  • CACV541/2018THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER v. BROWN COLVIN MORTON
  • CACV59/2017KWOK HIU CHUN DAMIEN v. THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER
  • CACV80/1989STANDARD CHARTERED BANK AND ANOTHER v. THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER
  • CACV84/2006THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER v. CHAN HING TO
  • CAMP138/2020THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER v. CHOW TUNG SHAN
  • HCA2731/2015CHUNG SUN KWAN v. THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER
  • HCAL63/2002PHILIP LEIGH TOSE v. THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER
  • HCAL64/2002WONG WING CHEONG, PETER v. THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER
  • HCAL67/2003COSIMO BORRELLI AND ANOTHER v. THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER
  • HCB1/1977EDWARD WONG & CO LTD v. THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER
  • HCB251/1983MARIA PUN SIU FUN v. THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER
  • HCB297/1984STANDARD CHARTERED BANK HONG KONG TRUSTEE LTD v. THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER
  • HCB941/1990THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER v. MAK PUI YUK AND OTHERS
[2020] HKCFI 2856-EN-2020-10-29

THE OFFICIAL RECEIVER v. LAM CHUN HING

HTML content

HCMP 263/2020

[2020] HKCFI 2856

IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE

HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION

COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE

MISCELLANEOUS PROCEEDINGS NO. 263 OF 2020

___________________

 

IN THE MATTER OF KEUNG TAI LOGISTICS LIMITED (IN LIQUIDATION)

 

and

 

IN THE MATTER OF SECTION 168I(2) OF THE COMPANIES (WINDING UP AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS) ORDINANCE (CHAPTER 32)

__________________

BETWEEN  
 THE OFFICIAL RECEIVERApplicant
 and 
 LAM CHUN HINGRespondent

______________________

Before:  Hon Anthony Chan J in Court

Date of Hearing: 29 October 2020

Date of Decision:  29 October 2020

_________________

D E C I S I O N

_________________

1.  I am satisfied that this application for extension of time by the Official Receiver to commence proceedings under s. 168H of the Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance, Cap 32 against the Respondent is properly grounded.

2.  This application was occasioned by the General Adjourned Period (GAP) put in place due to the COVID-19 pandemic.  If not for GAP, the s.168H application would have been filed on time.

3.  There is clearly public interest involved by reason of the conducts of the Respondent set out in paragraph 8 of the Affirmation of Ms Mabel Kwan filed on 13 March 2020.

4.  I am satisfied that there is strength in the case alleged against the Respondent.  I see no real prejudice to the Respondent in granting this application.

5.  For these reasons, I grant an extension of time of 1 month from today for commencement of the s.168H proceedings, and I make an order in terms of paragraphs 2 and 3 of the Originating Summons filed on 13 March 2020.

 (Anthony Chan)
 Judge of the Court of First Instance
  High Court

Ms Mabel Kwan of the Official Receiver’s Office, for the Applicant

The Respondent was not represented and did not appear